As we all know this week’s lecture and seminar was
canceled. I know there is nothing to do about it, but I think it would have
been very helpful to have a seminar to get a deeper understanding of the text by
Russell that we all read. A lot of people in class that I have been talking to
had a hard time reading the text. I guess we are not really used to reading philosophical
texts and that is why it takes a little longer to grasp the content.
The last time I read a philosophical text was probably
five or six years ago, back in high school. I had to read more slowly than what
I am used to and I had to repeat certain parts before I was able to really
understand them. First, I read the whole thing from beginning to the end
without taking any notes. When I was done with that, I used a source called
SparkNotes, which is a site that keeps summaries of all kinds of books. It was
really helpful to get a short recap of all the basic terms and Russell’s main thoughts.
The summary also helped me a lot when I answered the four questions connected
to this theme.
I did learn some new things and refreshed a couple of
old classic philosophical issues (such as if physical objects really exist or
if they are just a product of our imagination). I do find these topics
interesting, but I am having a hard time seeing a real connection to my
education and this course. Since I am going to write my master’s thesis next
semester I really want to learn more about the scientific process and the style
in which you need to write. However, it is important to know more about the
scientific foundation that all our works should be based on. In some chapters
Russell writes about knowledge and how we acquire knowledge, which is closely
connected to our studies here at KTH. Russell suggests that we could be “mislead”
by reality and derive “false knowledge” (i.e. something that could be true but
based on a false assumption). This is something that I will try to keep in mind
when I am going to write my master’s thesis and conduct my data collection.
Even though I might believe that I have knowledge of something, I always need
to have the “doubt” in the back of my mind if it is really based on a true assumption
or a correct question. I think this is the most important thing that I can take
away from this week’s theme.
To conclude, I think this theme could be seen as an
introduction to science, but I really hope that we get to go more “hands on” on
the scientific method. Looking back at my old bachelor’s thesis I really hope
that I could produce something much better for my master’s thesis.
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar